<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unnecessary Barrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/</link>
	<description>Knowbility blogs about technology that everyone can use.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:49:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elcoj</title>
		<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Elcoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap ipod nano</title>
		<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap ipod nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>thx for this post!!I like it ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for this post!!I like it ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed &#124; Wood TV Stand</title>
		<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed &#124; Wood TV Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>[...] An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed   Posted by root 2 hours 12 minutes ago (http://universallydesigned.net)        Well from an accessibility standpoint requiring readability makes few months ago i posted thom lohman first time poster here your friend comment universally designed is proudly powered by wordpress bloggingpro theme        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed   Posted by root 2 hours 12 minutes ago (<a href="http://universallydesigned.net" rel="nofollow">http://universallydesigned.net</a>)        Well from an accessibility standpoint requiring readability makes few months ago i posted thom lohman first time poster here your friend comment universally designed is proudly powered by wordpress bloggingpro theme        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | An Unnecessary Barrier Universally Designed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris flock</title>
		<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>chris flock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Well, from an accessibility standpoint, requiring readability makes perfect sense. But from a copyright standpoint, some people could argue that Amazon is creating a derivative work by selling readings of the books.

So Amazon could get sued for violating ADA. And they could get sued for copyright violation.

IMHO, both lawsuits would fail (as Amazon isn&#039;t a brick-and-mortar, and they aren&#039;t technically selling readings but rather selling technology that people can use to create readings). But Amazon probably wants to avoid lawsuits on both sides. Since the copyright crowd is probably more litigious than the accessibility crowd (by a hair), Amazon will probably err on the side of copyright protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from an accessibility standpoint, requiring readability makes perfect sense. But from a copyright standpoint, some people could argue that Amazon is creating a derivative work by selling readings of the books.</p>
<p>So Amazon could get sued for violating ADA. And they could get sued for copyright violation.</p>
<p>IMHO, both lawsuits would fail (as Amazon isn&#8217;t a brick-and-mortar, and they aren&#8217;t technically selling readings but rather selling technology that people can use to create readings). But Amazon probably wants to avoid lawsuits on both sides. Since the copyright crowd is probably more litigious than the accessibility crowd (by a hair), Amazon will probably err on the side of copyright protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; links for 2009-04-15&#160;&#8212;&#160;contentious.com</title>
		<link>http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; links for 2009-04-15&#160;&#8212;&#160;contentious.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universallydesigned.net/general/an-unnecessary-barrier/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>[...] An Unnecessary Barrier &#124; Universally Designed Blind person takes issue with the Authors Guild attempt to get amazon to allow publishers to disable text-to-speech on the Kindle on accessibility grounds. I think this is a VERY good point. Why not make all text material more accessible to people with visual impairments? (tags: books e-books content-rights Kindle e-readers accessibility audio conflict) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Unnecessary Barrier | Universally Designed Blind person takes issue with the Authors Guild attempt to get amazon to allow publishers to disable text-to-speech on the Kindle on accessibility grounds. I think this is a VERY good point. Why not make all text material more accessible to people with visual impairments? (tags: books e-books content-rights Kindle e-readers accessibility audio conflict) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
